"If everyone is too quick to agree convict an accused, then it is better to release him, because everything is suspect unanimous decision "(The Talmud).
The case of Côte d'Ivoire - three questions: Jean-Claude Guillebaud, Olympia Bhêly-Quenum Gaston Kelman ...
"Something is beginning to disturb the media discourse concerning Côte d'Ivoire. A query spread of opinion: while it may not be as simple as was believed in this case. Until then, we thought [...]: defeated at the polls, repudiated by a majority of voters, condemned by the international community unanimously Gbagbo sinfully clung to power, can cause carnage in the country . [...]
The cause seemed so heard. Both France and America and the United Nations had also recognized the true winner Alassane Ouattara election, that is to say the legitimate president. Several countries in West Africa, the same opinion, were willing to intervene militarily to ward off evil losing power. I must say that it is precisely this unanimity, since the beginning bothered me. I thought of a wise Jewish tradition, quoted by Emmanuel Levinas in one of his "Lessons Talmudic": if everyone is too quick to condemn a defendant to agree, then it is better to release him, because everything unanimous decision is suspect "(Jean-Claude Guillebaud , January 2011).
* "Never in the history of Franco-African relations, a crisis has raised as many media and political bias in France as experienced by Côte d'Ivoire for nearly a decade.
Today, like yesterday in September 2002, at the outbreak of a military rebellion openly supported, or totally planned by a neighboring head of state, Blaise Compaore, and is unprecedented in sub-Saharan Africa, cutting the country into two, the African and international public opinion has to serve a unilateral interpretation, even truncated, events.
And to top it all, or even to reinforce the current opinion, the official French position was reduced to crush the head of state Laurent Gbagbo, to see him as the sole responsibility of the rebellion that led to the partition of the country, and today, the post-election crisis. [...] Never
UN has overstepped its mandate in such a manner, including in East Timor, Kosovo, Democratic Republic of Congo, to name a few. Ignoring the institutions of a sovereign country, a UN member for fifty years, and not giving themselves time to allow the Election Commission to discuss the challenges raised during the discussion, Mr. Choi [Representative of the Secretary-General UN] has clearly caved in to pressure from certain countries, especially France and [...].
The post-election crisis in Cote d'Ivoire illustrates obviously the perpetuation of the political interference of France in Africa, while not taking more grotesque forms of direct military action aimed at maintaining internal order in favor of "Presidents friends," not leads to the same results no less than before "( Olympus Bhêly-Quenum January 2011).
"The disarmament of the rebellion [was] essential prerequisite to the holding of credible elections. The international community does not care and systematically pounded the Ivorian president-elect, urging him to organize elections under conditions known to lead inevitably to a deadlock.
elections are held. In the North, the rebellion is still armed. The day after the second round - 29 November 2010 - the press, saying that the favor one side or another, is unanimous to highlight the decline in participation over the first round. We're talking about 70%. The same day, a statement from UNOCI - representing the army of the United Nations in Côte d'Ivoire - reported a turnout of "around 70%." The day after, miraculously, the turnout jumped jumper the pole and crossed the 80% mark.
The "international community" and validate UNOCI, adoubent their champion, the focus on the font of the unspeakable and the crowning night in his campaign headquarters, under the tender eye of the ambassadors of France and the USA . [...]
The press as a whole, the most revolutionary in the most revolting, with the notable exception of the Gri-Gri International - if I forget, mea culpa - so conveys the urge, the speech gag policy blind and impious petitions - the world of ideas - an intelligentsia in the blind opportunity - it has not always been, God thank you - that sign, deafened by the uproar surrounding some Africans that one of them admitted to me implicitly and rectify his mistake with the shot through a forum. [...]
international community and others, will you tell me one day what charm unlikely, how virginity sudden, you dress Alassane Ouattara, former Prime Minister that can be said without any malice that embodies a past very few of which were also democratic victims of Ivorian guilty of opposition, and his soul damned rebel Guillaume Soro, unlikely maker kings, promising punishment to lag larigot! Will you tell me a day what you reward them in - for Salome, the daughter of Herodias, it was his talent as a dancer - to offer them on a tray as before that of Jean-Baptiste, head of Côte d'Ivoire that do not belong to you! What interests - let me naive transient point - you push the demonization of a sudden man, Laurent Gbagbo, who was the only leader to have an Ivorian opposition impossible but peaceful Felix Houphouet-Boigny, to accept the prison and exile to run for the presidency, to gain from the opposition, never having compromised his fight by accepting a bribe morocco. [...]
Who could understand that after the celebration of the fiftieth anniversary of independence of former French colonies in Africa, the continent is still viewed with the eyes of the documentary recently aired on television by France French Africa, documentary unexpected prophetic, announcing the victory of Ouattara - the convoluted explanations of the director can do nothing - then it was produced months before the Ivorian elections? Who can accept a certain Mr. Choi still behaves as a commander of a circle? Our children do we despise it not rightly know if we had remained silent before the grotesque spectacle of a stealth declaration of the victory of a candidate by foreign ambassadors in his headquarters "(Gaston Kelman , January 2011 ).
*
"Something is beginning to disturb the media discourse concerning Côte d'Ivoire. A query spread of opinion: while it may not be as simple as was believed in this case. Until then, we thought [...]: defeated at the polls, repudiated by a majority of voters, condemned by the international community unanimously Gbagbo sinfully clung to power, can cause carnage in the country . [...]
The cause seemed so heard. Both France and America and the United Nations had also recognized the true winner Alassane Ouattara election, that is to say the legitimate president. Several countries in West Africa, the same opinion, were willing to intervene militarily to ward off evil losing power. I must say that it is precisely this unanimity, since the beginning bothered me. I thought of a wise Jewish tradition, quoted by Emmanuel Levinas in one of his "Lessons Talmudic": if everyone is too quick to condemn a defendant to agree, then it is better to release him, because everything unanimous decision is suspect "(Jean-Claude Guillebaud , January 2011).
* "Never in the history of Franco-African relations, a crisis has raised as many media and political bias in France as experienced by Côte d'Ivoire for nearly a decade.
Today, like yesterday in September 2002, at the outbreak of a military rebellion openly supported, or totally planned by a neighboring head of state, Blaise Compaore, and is unprecedented in sub-Saharan Africa, cutting the country into two, the African and international public opinion has to serve a unilateral interpretation, even truncated, events.
And to top it all, or even to reinforce the current opinion, the official French position was reduced to crush the head of state Laurent Gbagbo, to see him as the sole responsibility of the rebellion that led to the partition of the country, and today, the post-election crisis. [...] Never
UN has overstepped its mandate in such a manner, including in East Timor, Kosovo, Democratic Republic of Congo, to name a few. Ignoring the institutions of a sovereign country, a UN member for fifty years, and not giving themselves time to allow the Election Commission to discuss the challenges raised during the discussion, Mr. Choi [Representative of the Secretary-General UN] has clearly caved in to pressure from certain countries, especially France and [...].
The post-election crisis in Cote d'Ivoire illustrates obviously the perpetuation of the political interference of France in Africa, while not taking more grotesque forms of direct military action aimed at maintaining internal order in favor of "Presidents friends," not leads to the same results no less than before "( Olympus Bhêly-Quenum January 2011).
*
"The disarmament of the rebellion [was] essential prerequisite to the holding of credible elections. The international community does not care and systematically pounded the Ivorian president-elect, urging him to organize elections under conditions known to lead inevitably to a deadlock.
elections are held. In the North, the rebellion is still armed. The day after the second round - 29 November 2010 - the press, saying that the favor one side or another, is unanimous to highlight the decline in participation over the first round. We're talking about 70%. The same day, a statement from UNOCI - representing the army of the United Nations in Côte d'Ivoire - reported a turnout of "around 70%." The day after, miraculously, the turnout jumped jumper the pole and crossed the 80% mark.
The "international community" and validate UNOCI, adoubent their champion, the focus on the font of the unspeakable and the crowning night in his campaign headquarters, under the tender eye of the ambassadors of France and the USA . [...]
The press as a whole, the most revolutionary in the most revolting, with the notable exception of the Gri-Gri International - if I forget, mea culpa - so conveys the urge, the speech gag policy blind and impious petitions - the world of ideas - an intelligentsia in the blind opportunity - it has not always been, God thank you - that sign, deafened by the uproar surrounding some Africans that one of them admitted to me implicitly and rectify his mistake with the shot through a forum. [...]
international community and others, will you tell me one day what charm unlikely, how virginity sudden, you dress Alassane Ouattara, former Prime Minister that can be said without any malice that embodies a past very few of which were also democratic victims of Ivorian guilty of opposition, and his soul damned rebel Guillaume Soro, unlikely maker kings, promising punishment to lag larigot! Will you tell me a day what you reward them in - for Salome, the daughter of Herodias, it was his talent as a dancer - to offer them on a tray as before that of Jean-Baptiste, head of Côte d'Ivoire that do not belong to you! What interests - let me naive transient point - you push the demonization of a sudden man, Laurent Gbagbo, who was the only leader to have an Ivorian opposition impossible but peaceful Felix Houphouet-Boigny, to accept the prison and exile to run for the presidency, to gain from the opposition, never having compromised his fight by accepting a bribe morocco. [...]
Who could understand that after the celebration of the fiftieth anniversary of independence of former French colonies in Africa, the continent is still viewed with the eyes of the documentary recently aired on television by France French Africa, documentary unexpected prophetic, announcing the victory of Ouattara - the convoluted explanations of the director can do nothing - then it was produced months before the Ivorian elections? Who can accept a certain Mr. Choi still behaves as a commander of a circle? Our children do we despise it not rightly know if we had remained silent before the grotesque spectacle of a stealth declaration of the victory of a candidate by foreign ambassadors in his headquarters "(Gaston Kelman , January 2011 ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment